Click here for assistance facilitating a Short Sale or Foreclosure 

Going Direct with Bank for Modification – 22% of Mortgages Default – San Diego

Mortgage modifications in San Diego and nationwide under the government’s HAMP or Home Affordable Modification Program have resulting in about 11% of the modifications falling two months behind in their payments in San Diego and elsewhere, according to a banking regulators’ report issued in September.  Lender-direct modifications result in more than 22% of San Diego loans redefaulted.  The difference between the HAMP and non-HAMP modification known: HAMP modifications reduce a borrowers’ monthly payment by an average of $608, while bank modifications lower it only by $307, including in San Diego. “There is a correlation between sustainability of payment and the reduction in the payment,” said Joe Evers, deputy comptroller at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which put out the report along with the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Under HAMP, eligible borrowers can have their monthly payments lowered to 31% of their pre-tax income as long as its more profitable for the bank to modify the loan than to foreclose. Make note of this – while you may qualify if the bank/investor can make more money now by foreclosing, then it won’t matter if you qualify or not – they will just foreclose. The federal government pays servicers an incentive to participate in the program, but these incentives may not be enough.  Also, proprietary bank modifications are outpacing HAMP adjustments by more than 2-to-1. Many troubled homeowners are falling out of the government program and 44.5% of them are receiving bank modifications. Housing counselors have been wary of direct bank modifications, mainly because there is not a lot of information about them. They caution homeowners to make sure they understand the terms of the adjustment. A Chase spokesman said HAMP is always the first program the bank considers for troubled borrowers “because it lowers the payment more than most other programs.” If they don’t qualify for HAMP, they are reviewed for a proprietary modification.

One small new condition that most banks are adding to the remodified mortgage/contract is that the homeowner will agree to waive all rights to legal remedies after the loan modification is signed.  What does that mean?  It means that if the bank has defrauded you in any way such as charging you illegal fees at closing which will cost you thousands of dollars extra over the life of the loan, you have just given up your legal rights to  to rectify that fraud.  Homeowner beware!!!

Foreclosure Forgeries by Banks Exposed – San Diego

Bank of America, GMAC, JP Morgan Chase,  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have all been caught forging signatures, creating fake documents, and other illegal activity when trying to foreclose.  The Washington Post’s article below goes into the ugly details.  This goes to prove that the lenders are not playing fair when dealing with your mortgage, and you must be on your guard.  For that reason, we are recommending a forensic loan audit before you approach the lender.  You must have ammunition to fight back!  Whether you choose to remodify the mortgage (and stay in the same fraudulent contract), get out of the contract through a short sale, or decide to pursue an administrative (HUD) remidy or legal remedy, we encourage you to fight fire with fire (but be above board, unlike the banks).  

It’s a tough real estate market for everyone, particularly in San Diego.  Homeowners in San Diego are being invited by the banks to “meet with them”, but unknown to them these lenders and/or services are just stringing them along to eventually take the house.  I say be prepared for battle! 

Amid mountain of paperwork, shortcuts and forgeries mar foreclosure process
 
By Ariana Eunjung Cha and Brady Dennis
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, September 23, 2010; 2:36 AM

The nation’s overburdened foreclosure system is riddled with faked documents, forged signatures and lenders who take shortcuts reviewing borrower’s files, according to court documents and interviews with attorneys, housing advocates and company officials. The problems, which are so widespread that some judges approving the foreclosures ignore them, are coming to light after Ally Financial, the country’s fourth-biggest mortgage lender, halted home evictions in 23 states this week.

During the housing boom, millions of homeowners got easy access to mortgages while providing virtually no proof of their income or background. Now, as millions of Americans are being pushed out of the homes they can no longer afford, the foreclosure process is producing far more paperwork than anyone can read and making it vulnerable to fraud.

Ally Financial is now double-checking to make sure all documents are in order after lawsuits uncovered that a single employee of the company’s GMAC mortgage unit, a 41-year-old named Jeffrey Stephan, signed off on 10,000 foreclosure papers a month without checking whether the information justified an eviction.

Many of the homeowners in fact might have been in default. Some might have been unfairly targeted. But the flawed process is creating an opening for borrowers to contest some of the more than 2 million foreclosures that have taken place since the real estate crisis began.

The company sought to play down the impact of Stephan’s actions, saying this week that what he did amounted to a “technical” error but that the documents themselves were “factually accurate.” Ally said it had no further comment Wednesday.

Forgeries

Ally wasn’t the only major lender that had a foreclosure process dependent on a few corporate bureaucrats.

Beth Ann Cottrell said in a sworn deposition in May that she signed off on thousands of foreclosures a month for JPMorgan Chase even though she did not verify the accuracy of the information.

In one instance in Palm Beach, Fla., Cottrell signed off on two documents that stated conflicting amounts of mortgage, the court testimony states. Cottrell claimed that both were signed by the borrower at closing. But the homeowner recognized that her signature had been forged, her attorney Christopher Immel said. The attorney added that such forgeries are common among the cases he’s seen. JPMorgan Chase declined to comment.

In Georgia, an employee of a document processing company, Linda Green, for years claimed to be executives of Bank of America, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank and dozens of other lenders while signing off on tens of thousands of foreclosure affidavits. In many cases, her signature appeared to be forged by different employees.

Green worked for a foreclosure document company owned by Lender Processing Services. The company is being investigated by a U.S. attorney in Florida for allegedly using improper documentation to speed foreclosures.

Lenders have already started to withdraw foreclosures that had Green’s name on them. Green also submitted to courts documents that listed “Bogus Assignee” as the owner of a mortgage instead of the real name. In another case, she signed as the vice president of “Bad Bene,” a made-up company Michelle Kersch, a senior vice president for Lender Processing Services, said in an e-mailed statement Wednesday that the names were just “placeholders.”

“Unfortunately, on occasion, incomplete documents were inadvertently recorded before the missing information was obtained,” she said. “LPS regrets these errors and the use of this particular placeholder phrasing.”

The company declined to comment further, citing the pending criminal investigation.

A large chunk of the nation’s foreclosures are being initiated by three companies owned by the federal government: Ally, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie and Freddie have said they are looking at the matter but refuse to reveal the numbers of affected homeowners.

The Obama administration has repeatedly said it would try to help homeowners facing foreclosure. But its principal mortgage-relief effort is faltering. More than half of those who enrolled in the program are have now fallen out of it, the Treasury Department said Wednesday.

This week, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and the Obama administration’s newly appointed consumer protection adviser, Elizabeth Warren, also vowed to simplify the process for getting a mortgage.

But when asked to respond to problems plaguing foreclosures at the companies controlled by the Treasury, a spokesman repeatedly declined to respond to questions, saying only that the agency does not involve itself in the companies’ day-to-day affairs.

Judges’ oversight

Some of the problems in foreclosure paperwork are being created because mortgage loans were repackaged and resold to investors so often that the physical documents become lost. It’s the job of a document processor to present and vouch for the authenticity and accuracy of these papers, but attorneys for homeowners have unearthed examples where critical records are forged.

In theory, a judge should review the files one more time. But after the crisis produced massive numbers of delinquent homeowners, judges in many cases became overwhelmed.

Some simply took at face value the documents handed over to them by the lenders – who in many cases were not checking the files, either, according to interviews with judges, attorneys and consumer groups.

In some Florida courts, for instance, many judges automatically approve a foreclosure unless a borrower can point to a specific problem. Homeowners are given five minutes for a presentation. Often, they do not bother to show up.

Arthur M. Schack, a Kings County Supreme Court judge in Brooklyn, said it’s clear those involved in the foreclosure process are taking the legal requirements too lightly. They forget, he said, that there’s a bigger picture to think about: People are losing their homes.

“There are ramifications on society and neighborhoods,” he said.

Schack has become infamous among some of the nation’s most powerful banks for rejecting foreclosure motions that come across his courtroom – about half of the hundreds of files that he has reviewed over nearly three years. He said Ally’s document-processing violations shouldn’t be dismissed lightly.

“There are procedures to be followed in order to get a foreclosure, and you either get it right or not. Either you’re pregnant or not. There’s no in-between,” he said.

But Judge Isaac Garb, a retired trial judge in Bucks County, Pa., who has heard many foreclosure cases and still oversees mortgage mediations, had a different view.

He said that because foreclosure files contain standard language, document processors such as Stephan do not need to review every page. He added that the signers are verifying only that the information in the file is “true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belief.”

Often, homeowners are using minor problems in the documents simply to stall the foreclosure process as long as possible, Garb said.

David Berenbaum, chief program officer for the nonprofit National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said companies eager to get bad loans off their books quickly have given rise to a foreclosure system that is as faulty as the excessive lending that created the problem in the first place.

“What’s happened here is that there are these foreclosure machines that don’t do due diligence and that are profiting at the expense of consumers,” he said.

Dennis reported from Doylestown, Pa. Staff researchers Julie Tate and Magda Jean-Louis contributed to this report. Julie regularly posts at her blog as well. www.JulieFontaine.com.

New HAFA Program Takes Effect today (April 5)

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) Program

The government’s new solution to the foreclosure crisis – the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA Program) takes effect today.

What will this do for the homeowner and real estate professionals in San Diego and Orange County? 

The HAFA program is designed to complement the HAMP Program (aka loan modification).   A homeowner needs to go through the HAMP Program and qualify.  If they qualify this is what it will do for the homeowner

  1. It will allow up to $1,500 in moving expenses
  2. It will give up to $3,000 to junior lien holders to release their lien/s
  3. It will result in full satisfaction of the debt without signing a promissory note, provide cash at closing, or have to worry about a deficiency judgement
  4. It will ensure the real estate professional helping the homeowner receives full commissions

Here’s where it may all fall apart:

  1. All lenders must agree to participate in the HAFA Program.  THe HAMP Program was a dismall failure because of the “voluntary participation” clause. Why will this be any different?
  2. It requires the Buyer of the house to hold it for at least 90 days.  What if someone buys it to fix it up and sell it?  This will eliminate most cash buyers in this market. 
  3. The homeowner has to qualify for the program.
  4. The home must be your primary residence.  If it’s a second home, or rental it doesn’t qualify.

Although it sounds good on paper, stay tuned for the results. 

 If you are tired of being shackled to your debt, and feel you are ready to sell. Call us at (619) 631-4546.   We will work with you to negotiate the debt and get your house sold so you can move on with your life.

California AB 764 & SB 94: End of Up-Front Fees for Loan Modifications?

Effective October 11, 2009 in California, our state legislature will be implementing to the new regulations aimed at shutting down unscrupulous loan modification companies that take people’s money and run, without providing loan modification services. California AB 764 and SB 94 has been signed by the governor.  Many cases have been reported of homeowners facing foreclosure and entering into a contract with loan modification companies, with fee paid up front, but the loan mods never go through.

Many of the problems with newbie loan modification companies is their lack of understanding of bank policy regarding the modificiation of the loan.  Unfamiliar with the bank policies theses loan mod companies take clients whether they are qualified or not.  The end results is homeowners in foreclosure do not get their loan mod, and lose their home to forclosure.  This has been the case with many San Diego homeowners facing foreclosur, and turning to late night TV advertisers that claim that they can modifiy your loan if you are in foreclosure. 

The new legislature goes into effect October 12, 2009.

Foreclosure Activity Remains Near Record Levels

Homes being lost to foreclosure in San Diego, Califorina and nationwide have not slowed significantly according to the latest RealtyTrac report.   California continues to be one of the leading states for notices of default, foreclosures, and short sales.  Economists project that this market will remain for months to come and almost half of all homeowners will lose significant equity in their home.

You may be able to save the equity in your house using a forensic loan audit.  Apply today.

FORECLOSURE ACTIVITY REMAINS NEAR RECORD LEVEL IN AUGUST 2009

By RealtyTrac Staff   

 Foreclosure Activity Decreases Less Than 1 Percent From Record High in July

Activity Up 18 Percent From August 2008 Despite Year-Over-Year Drop in REOs

 IRVINE, Calif. — September 10, 2009 — RealtyTrac® released its August 2009 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 358,471 U.S. properties during the month, a decrease of less than 1 percent from the previous month but still an increase of nearly 18 percent from August 2008. The report also shows one in every 357 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing in August.

 “The August report demonstrates that there is still an ample supply of properties filling the foreclosure pipeline even while the outflow of bank-owned REO properties onto the resale market is being more carefully regulated,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “After hitting a high for the year in July, REOs dropped 13 percent in August, but we also saw a record high number of properties either entering default or being scheduled for a public foreclosure auction for the first time.”

 Nevada, Florida, California post top state foreclosure rates

 With one in every 62 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in August, Nevada continued to document the nation’s highest state foreclosure rate despite an 8 percent decrease in foreclosure activity from the previous month. A total of 17,902 Nevada properties received a foreclosure filing during the month, still an increase of 53 percent from August 2008.

 Florida documented the nation’s second highest state foreclosure rate, with one in every 140 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing, and California documented the nation’s third highest state foreclosure rate, with one in every 144 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.

 A 10 percent month-to-month decrease in foreclosure activity helped lower Arizona’s foreclosure rate from the nation’s third highest in July to fourth highest in August. One in every 150 Arizona housing units received a foreclosure filing in August — still more than twice the national average.

 Six states account for more than 60 percent of national total

 Six states accounted for 62 percent of the nation’s total foreclosure activity in August despite decreasing REOs in all six states. California REOs dropped 32 percent from the previous month, but the state continued to post the highest overall total of any state, with 92,326 properties receiving a foreclosure filing in August. California’s total was down 15 percent from the previous month and was also down 9 percent from August 2009 — the first year-over-year decrease in California foreclosure activity in RealtyTrac’s monthly reports.

 A total of 62,401 Florida properties received foreclosure filings in August, the nation’s second highest state total and an increase of more than 10 percent from the previous month despite a 5 percent decrease in REO filings. Initial default notices in Florida increased 12 percent from the previous month, and scheduled auctions increased 13 percent from the previous month.

 A new law in Michigan requiring lenders to file a separate public notice of default before scheduling a foreclosure auction boosted overall foreclosure activity numbers in the state for August. A total of 9,789 of the new default notices were reported in August, bringing the total number of Michigan properties receiving foreclosure filings to 19,359 for the month — a 134 percent spike from the previous month and third highest among the states. Michigan’s foreclosure rate leapfrogged from 19th highest in July to fifth highest in August.

 With 17,902 properties receiving foreclosure filings in August, Nevada posted the nation’s fourth highest total despite a 24 percent decrease in REO filings from the previous month, and with 17,807 properties receiving foreclosure filings in August, Arizona posted the nation’s fifth highest total despite an 11 percent decrease in REO filings from the previous month.

 Illinois REO filings decreased 15 percent from the previous month, but the state’s total of 13,078 properties receiving foreclosure filings was still sixth highest among all the states in August.

 Other states with totals among the 10 highest in the country were Georgia (11,947), Ohio (11,368), Texas (11,261) and New Jersey (8,316).

 Three states dominate top 10 metro foreclosure rates

 Foreclosure filings were reported on 14,940 Las Vegas properties in August, one in every 53 housing units — more than 6.7 times the national average and the highest foreclosure rate among metro areas with a population of at least 200,000. The city’s foreclosure activity was down 11 percent from the previous month but still up 48 percent from August 2008.

 With one in every 86 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in August, the Reno-Sparks metro area joined Las Vegas in the top 10, posting the seventh highest metro foreclosure rate.

 Six California metro areas documented foreclosure rates among the top 10 in August. Stockton posted the nation’s second highest metro foreclosure rate — one in every 74 housing units received a foreclosure filing — followed by Merced at No. 3 (one in 78), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario at No. 4 (one in 80), Vallejo-Fairfield at No. 5 (one in 82), Modesto at No. 6 (one in 84), and Bakersfield at No. 10 (one in 94).

 Two Florida metro areas documented foreclosure rates among the top 10: Orlando-Kissimmee at No. 8 with one in every 87 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing, and Cape Coral-Fort Myers at No. 9 with one in every 88 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.