Click here for assistance facilitating a Short Sale or Foreclosure 

Barlays Report: Countrywide Picks Up Pace Resolving Troubled Loans

Bank of America – Countrywide Loans

Bank of America liquidation and modification rates on formerly Countrywide-serviced residential loans have edged higher in the past few months, with a larger percentage of mortgage restructurings encompassing principal forgiveness, according to a study just released by Barclays Capital. The research firm examined loans within residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) serviced by Countrywide, now Bank of America Home Loans, and found that while historically, Countrywide-serviced deals have claimed lower-than-average mod rates and long liquidation timelines, that has begun to turn around in the past few months. Barclays reports that constant default rates (CDRs) on pools of mortgages serviced by the once-subprime leader have improved, primarily due to faster roll rates, as well as rejections from Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trials, which allow the loan to proceed to foreclosure.

Analysts at Barclays expect Countrywide’s liquidation rates to continue to increase as more HAMP trials are resolved in the coming months. Many of these resolutions, though, do include transitions to permanent loan restructurings. Barclays says HAMP conversions have also boosted modification rates for Countrywide, and the research firm found that debt forgiveness mods now make up 10 percent of the servicer’s modified loans, up from 0 percent in January. The research firm says it as seen “continuous improvement” in current to delinquent rolls and falling 60-plus day delinquencies. Barclays says there have been important changes in servicer behavior in the Countrywide camp.  HAMP rejection rates for Countrywide loans have shot up in the past few months and now constitute 36 percent of all resolved trial mods.  According to the Treasury’s latest HAMP progress report, Countrywide/Bank of America is servicing approximately 215,000 active trial mods and has finalized near ly 57,000 permanent loan restructurings.

Fed says “extended period” may last a long time

By Pedro Nicolaci da Costa

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve could keep interest rates ultra-low for even longer than investors expect if the economic outlook worsens or inflation drops, minutes from the central bank’s last meeting suggested.

The minutes of the Fed’s March 16 gathering, released on Tuesday showed lingering concern about the U.S. economy’s prospects, with policymakers indicating they were in no hurry to raise interest rates.

“The duration of the extended period prior to policy firming might last for quite some time and could even increase if the economic outlook worsened appreciably or if trend inflation appeared to be declining further,” the minutes said.

“Such forward guidance would not limit the committee’s ability to commence monetary policy tightening promptly,” they said.

Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig again dissented on this count, favoring a more flexible commitment to keep rates low “for some time,” according to the minutes, which did not elicit major market reaction.

Fed officials expressed concern about renewed weakness in housing and persistently high unemployment, saying the threat of a vicious cycle had not fully receded.

“Participants agreed that household spending going forward was likely to remain constrained by weak labor market conditions, lower housing wealth, tight credit, and modest income growth,” the minutes said.

The release of the minutes comes on the heels of a U.S. government payrolls report that showed employers added 162,000 jobs in March. Still, the data was marked by a number of seasonal distortions, and the jobless rate remained stuck at 9.7 percent.

In a separate speech on Tuesday, Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota said he would be surprised if the U.S. unemployment rate, managed to dip below 8 percent by the end of 2011.

Housing starts will likely remain low, possibly for several years, he added, although the U.S. economy could recover even without a turnaround in the housing market.

EXTENDING “EXTENDED PERIOD”

In response to the worst financial crisis in generations, the Fed not only slashed interest rates to the bone but also undertook a host of emergency measures aimed at reviving credit.

Broadly speaking, the Fed’s latest assessment of economic conditions was downbeat. The central bank characterized inflation pressures as subdued and likely to remain that way, while noting that expectations for price increases are “reasonably” well-anchored.

Against that backdrop, a few Fed members indicated they thought the risk of tightening policy too soon was greater than that of waiting too long.

Not everyone agreed, however. Speaking to CNBC television, Richmond Fed president Jeffrey Lacker argued just the opposite.

“The risk going forward in this expansion is going to be a little more tilted toward waiting too long, and I’m going to be pretty vigilant about that,” Lacker said.

Some investors were taken aback by the Fed’s cautious tone given a solid 5.6 percent spurt in U.S. gross domestic product for the fourth quarter.

“It shows the Fed will be very deliberative with rate increases,” said Kevin Flanagan, chief fixed income strategist at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. “There is no urgency to raise rates for now.”

(Additional Reporting by Glenn Somerville, Kristina Cooke and Todd Melby; Editing by Andrew Hay)

New HAFA Program Takes Effect today (April 5)

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA) Program

The government’s new solution to the foreclosure crisis – the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternative (HAFA Program) takes effect today.

What will this do for the homeowner and real estate professionals in San Diego and Orange County? 

The HAFA program is designed to complement the HAMP Program (aka loan modification).   A homeowner needs to go through the HAMP Program and qualify.  If they qualify this is what it will do for the homeowner

  1. It will allow up to $1,500 in moving expenses
  2. It will give up to $3,000 to junior lien holders to release their lien/s
  3. It will result in full satisfaction of the debt without signing a promissory note, provide cash at closing, or have to worry about a deficiency judgement
  4. It will ensure the real estate professional helping the homeowner receives full commissions

Here’s where it may all fall apart:

  1. All lenders must agree to participate in the HAFA Program.  THe HAMP Program was a dismall failure because of the “voluntary participation” clause. Why will this be any different?
  2. It requires the Buyer of the house to hold it for at least 90 days.  What if someone buys it to fix it up and sell it?  This will eliminate most cash buyers in this market. 
  3. The homeowner has to qualify for the program.
  4. The home must be your primary residence.  If it’s a second home, or rental it doesn’t qualify.

Although it sounds good on paper, stay tuned for the results. 

 If you are tired of being shackled to your debt, and feel you are ready to sell. Call us at (619) 631-4546.   We will work with you to negotiate the debt and get your house sold so you can move on with your life.

Will California Homeowners have to pay tax on the 1099 received from the lender?

Californians are still not excempt from paying taxes on the mortgage loss the bank has taken?

The article below by Sue McAllister depicts what thousands of California homeowners are facing this tax season.  Whether you complete a short sale or the house goes to sale, the lender may issue you a 1099 for the cancellation of the debt.  This is good and bad.  Good, because the likelihood of the lender now pursuing a deficiency judgement is slim since they technically have now closed out their books (this is also subject to debate).  It’s bad, because according to the federal and state tax law a 1099 is considered income and is fully taxable.  See our tax corner http://troubledpropertysolutions.com/tax-corner/ for discussions on how you can avoid paying those taxes on a federal level.  The State of California still has not issued any exception for the forgiveness of this phantom income, particularly for homeowners that lost their home or short saled in 2009.   The article suggest paying the taxes in advance to the State of California, but you may just want to hold on to your money until the dust settles.

It may also be beneficial to lobby our Governator to pass that bill!

March 2010

Central Valley real estate agent Donny Piwowarski last year sold his four-bedroom, 3,500-square-foot house on a half-acre in Tracy for $387,000 — about half of what he paid for it in 2005. Now with tax-filing season here, his situation is getting even grimmer.  Under California tax law, Piwowarski owes tens of thousands of dollars in state income tax on the nearly $400,000 in mortgage debt that was “canceled” when he sold his house for less than what he owed. The state considers canceled debt as taxable income in cases like Piwowarski’s and for thousands of other Californians who got rid of their homes last year in so-called “short sales.”

Since 2007, federal law has seen things differently, in many casessparing sellers any tax on debt canceled in a short sale, foreclosure or loan modification. In 2007 and 2008, California followed the feds’ lead, but the state law has not been extended to apply to mortgage debts canceled in 2009.

So an estimated 35,000 California taxpayers may be left owing state tax for 2009 on something the federal government does not consider taxable, according to the state Franchise Tax Board. Piwowarski is one of them.

“I paid a pretty penny, $765,000, for that house,” he said. “Now I have nearly $400,000 in canceled debt sitting out there that ultimately I’m going to be taxed on by California” if the law doesn’t change. ”It’s kind of like a double whammy.” The Legislature in mid-March approved a bill that would bring the state into conformity with federal tax law on debt cancellation. But Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it Thursday because he opposed some the bill’s provisions about tax penalties for businesses, said his deputy press secretary, Mike Naple.

Legislators are expected to draft a separate bill to fix the mortgage debt cancellation issue, and Schwarzenegger has said he supports that effort, but the timing is uncertain. Lynn Freer, president of Spidell Publishing, which publishes information about tax laws for tax preparers, said the discrepancy between state and federal law on debt cancellation stands to punish many former homeowners. “So those taxpayers are losing their houses, their credit is ruined and they end up owing on the forgiveness of debt as income they never saw. It’s kind of phantom income,” she said. Freer said she is hopeful legislation will eventually bring the state into line with the federal government on the matter, “but I think it probably won’t happen until after April 15,” the day federal and state tax returns must be filed.

She said California taxpayers who may owe state tax on canceled debt on their 2009 taxes can buy time by taking an automatic extension on (PrintExpress PDF Export. – IPA S) the filing deadline, giving them until Oct. 15 to file a state return. But for a taxpayer who expects to owe money to the state, “Pay what you think you’re going to owe, or as much as you can to avoid the penalty and interest,” she said.

There were at least 2,144 short sales in Santa Clara County and 703 in San Mateo County in 2009, according to brokerage ZipRealty, which gathered the data from the multiple listing service. More than 6,400 foreclosures occurred in those two counties last year, according to foreclosure information firm ForeclosureRadar. Piwowarski was forced to short-sell his house when he could no longer afford the payments because his income had dwindled, and he and his wife were separating. If California law doesn’t change to mirror the federal rules, he said, he’d have to pay his huge tax bill in installments “for the rest of my life.” “It would financially wreck me,” he said.

Program Will Pay Homeowners to Sell at a Loss

Short Sale in San Diego. – See the Article below from USA Today Website.

Troubled Property Solutions specializes in San Diego short sales, we have been in business for almost 3 years and have help many home owners through the short sales process.

Feel Free to call us on 619 631-4546 to discuss your situation.

In an effort to end the foreclosure crisis, the Obama administration has been trying to keep defaulting owners in their homes. Now it will take a new approach: paying some of them to leave.

This latest program, which will allow owners to sell for less than they owe and will give them a little cash to speed them on their way, is one of the administration’s most aggressive attempts to grapple with a problem that has defied solutions.

More than five million households are behind on their mortgages and risk foreclosure. The government’s $75 billion mortgage modification plan has helped only a small slice of them. Consumer advocates, economists and even some banking industry representatives say much more needs to be done.

For the administration, there is also the concern that millions of foreclosures could delay or even reverse the economy’s tentative recovery — the last thing it wants in an election year.

Taking effect on April 5, the program could encourage hundreds of thousands of delinquent borrowers who have not been rescued by the loan modification program to shed their houses through a process known as a short sale, in which property is sold for less than the balance of the mortgage. Lenders will be compelled to accept that arrangement, forgiving the difference between the market price of the property and what they are owed.

“We want to streamline and standardize the short sale process to make it much easier on the borrower and much easier on the lender,” said Seth Wheeler, a Treasury senior adviser.

The problem is highlighted by a routine case in Phoenix. Chris Paul, a real estate agent, has a house he is trying to sell on behalf of its owner, who owes $150,000. Mr. Paul has an offer for $48,000, but the bank holding the mortgage says it wants at least $90,000. The frustrated owner is now contemplating foreclosure.

To bring the various parties to the table — the homeowner, the lender that services the loan, the investor that owns the loan, the bank that owns the second mortgage on the property — the government intends to spread its cash around.

Under the new program, the servicing bank, as with all modifications, will get $1,000. Another $1,000 can go toward a second loan, if there is one. And for the first time the government would give money to the distressed homeowners themselves. They will get $1,500 in “relocation assistance.”

Should the incentives prove successful, the short sales program could have multiple benefits. For the investment pools that own many home loans, there is the prospect of getting more money with a sale than with a foreclosure.

For the borrowers, there is the likelihood of suffering less damage to credit ratings. And as part of the transaction, they will get the lender’s assurance that they will not later be sued for an unpaid mortgage balance.

For communities, the plan will mean fewer empty foreclosed houses waiting to be sold by banks. By some estimates, as many as half of all foreclosed properties are ransacked by either the former owners or vandals, which depresses the value of the property further and pulls down the value of neighboring homes.

If short sales are about to have their moment, it has been a long time coming. At the beginning of the foreclosure crisis, lenders shunned short sales. They were not equipped to deal with the labor-intensive process and were suspicious of it.

The lenders’ thinking, said the economist Thomas Lawler, went like this: “I lend someone $200,000 to buy a house. Then he says, ‘Look, I have someone willing to pay $150,000 for it; otherwise I think I’m going to default.’ Do I really believe the borrower can’t pay it back? And is $150,000 a reasonable offer for the property?”

Short sales are “tailor-made for fraud,” said Mr. Lawler, a former executive at the mortgage finance company Fannie Mae.

Last year, short sales started to increase, although they remain relatively uncommon. Fannie Mae said preforeclosure deals on loans in its portfolio more than tripled in 2009, to 36,968. But real estate agents say many lenders still seem to disapprove of short sales.

Under the new federal program, a lender will use real estate agents to determine the value of a home and thus the minimum to accept. This figure will not be shared with the owner, but if an offer comes in that is equal to or higher than this amount, the lender must take it.

Mr. Paul, the Phoenix agent, was skeptical. “In a perfect world, this would work,” he said. “But because estimates of value are inherently subjective, it won’t. The banks don’t want to sell at a discount.”

There are myriad other potential conflicts over short sales that may not be solved by the program, which was announced on Nov. 30 but whose details are still being fine-tuned. Many would-be short sellers have second and even third mortgages on their houses. Banks that own these loans are in a position to block any sale unless they get a piece of the deal.

“You have one loan, it’s no sweat to get a short sale,” said Howard Chase, a Miami Beach agent who says he does around 20 short sales a month. “But the second mortgage often is the obstacle.”

Major lenders seem to be taking a cautious approach to the new initiative. In many cases, big banks do not actually own the mortgages; they simply administer them and collect payments. J. K. Huey, a Wells Fargo vice president, said a short sale, like a loan modification, would have to meet the requirements of the investor who owns the loan.

“This is not an opportunity for the customer to just walk away,” Ms. Huey said. “If someone doesn’t come to us saying, ‘I’ve done everything I can, I used all my savings, I borrowed money and, by the way, I’m losing my job and moving to another city, and have all the documentation,’ we’re not going to do a short sale.”

But even if lenders want to treat short sales as a last resort for desperate borrowers, in reality the standards seem to be looser.

Sree Reddy, a lawyer and commercial real estate investor who lives in Miami Beach, bought a one-bedroom condominium in 2005, spent about $30,000 on improvements and ended up owing $540,000. Three years later, the value had fallen by 40 percent.

Mr. Reddy wanted to get out from under his crushing monthly payments. He lost a lot of money in the crash but was not in default. Nevertheless, his bank let him sell the place for $360,000 last summer.

“A short sale provides peace of mind,” said Mr. Reddy, 32. “If you’re in foreclosure, you don’t know when they’re ultimately going to take the place away from you.”

Mr. Reddy still lives in the apartment complex where he bought that condo, but is now a renter paying about half of his old mortgage payment. Another benefit, he said: “The place I’m in now is nicer and a little bigger.”