Click here for assistance facilitating a Short Sale or Foreclosure 

San Diego Foreclosures up 34% in January (DataQuick)

San Diego Foreclosures Rise Steeply in January 2011

A report today in the Union-Tribune / Data quick estimates that foreclosures have risen fast in San Diego. You can stay in control and not be foreclosed on by short selling your home.

[button_round color="blue" url="http://troubledpropertysolutions.com/short-sale-your-home/"] Stay in Control – Short Sale Your Home (Click Here) [/button_round]

Foreclosures and mortgage defaults in San Diego County both increased in January, after three consecutive months of drops, Wednesday’s DataQuick Information Systems numbers show. The upticks could signal an incoming wave of distressed properties coming onto the market in coming months, experts said.

Foreclosures rose to 959 in January from 715 in December, a 34 percent increase, the largest monthly jump since December 2009. Year-over-year, foreclosures fell from 986 in January 2010, or 2.7 percent.

There were 1,548 mortgage defaults in January, up slightly from 1522 in December, or 1.7 percent. Year-over-year, that number is down from 1,741 in January 2010, or 11.1 percent.

DataQuick spokesman Andrew LePage said the monthly jump in foreclosures could partly be due to “a little catch-up” after some banks froze foreclosure activity following discoveries of robo-signing, the practice of approving loan paperwork without proper review.

LePage added that monthly fluctuations in both data sets are normal given factors such as the role of government mortgage programs, lender log-jams and new housing laws, he said.

“We don’t expect any smooth trend lines going forward,” LePage said. But there’s “more catch-up to come,” he said.

Bob Kevane, president of the San Diego Association of Realtors, agrees more foreclosures are in the pipeline.

He’s heard local lenders saying they plan to stop delays in foreclosure processes and complete more of them this year, leading him to believe foreclosures will increase at the rate seen last month.

In DataQuick’s previous report in December, foreclosures and default notices in the county fell to their lowest levels in three years. However, industry experts warned not to read too much into that, given the expectations of a shadow inventory of distressed homes and an increase in short sales.

[button_round color="blue" url="http://troubledpropertysolutions.com/short-sale-your-home/"] Stay in Control – Short Sale Your Home (Click Here) [/button_round]

Southern California Home Sales Down – Prices Remain Steady

Southern California home sales are down, but San Diego real estate prices remain steady. San Diego Real Estate

Low San Diego real estate sales are attributable to the weak economy, tigher lending standards, lender loan fraud fears, and the ongoing foreclosures.  Foreclosure resales – homes that were foreclosed upon in the past year accounted for 35.1 percent of the resale market in November.  Fears of homeowners sueing their lender for faulty foreclosure process or an illegal foreclosure (servicer foreclosing not the actual lender) has kept resales of foreclosed homes slow. 

But homeowners still need to sell, due to job relocation, change in economic condition, or if they are too underwater (requiring a short sale).  Homes are still selling.  With the right agent and the right price, the home can be sold very quickly.  Get started today.  San Diego real estate market is surviving.

DQNew: Southland Home Sales Dip; Prices Change Little
December 15, 2010

La Jolla, CA—Southern California home sales fell in November to the second-lowest level for that month in 18 years, reflecting the weak economic recovery, a dormant new-home market and tight credit conditions. The median price paid for a home rose above a year earlier for the 12th consecutive month, though November’s gain was the tiniest yet, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 16,208 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties last month. That was down 3.2 percent from 16,744 sales in October, and down 15.5 percent from 19,181 in November 2009, according to MDA DataQuick of San Diego.

A drop in sales from October to November is normal for the season, with the decline averaging 8.1 percent since 1988, when DataQuick’s statistics begin. November’s sales were the lowest for that month since 2007, when 13,173 sold, and the second-lowest since 1992, when 15,446 sold. Last month’s sales fell 26.5 percent below the average November sales tally of 22,047.

In the new-home market, sales were the slowest for a November since at least 1988. In many growth areas the math for builders just doesn’t work: The cost to construct is higher than what buyers can afford or are willing to pay. Often builders can’t compete with the pricing of nearby resale homes, especially foreclosures and short sales.

“The great waiting game of 2010 continues. This is the year when the economy sputtered and a lot of potential home buyers opted to sit tight, especially once the government incentives dried up. Fundamentally home sales remain weak because the job market has been slow to mend and credit policies remain unusually tight,” said John Walsh, MDA DataQuick president. “But with sales this low, for this long, you know there are a lot of people just waiting to jump into the market once they feel the time is right. For many the key signal will be a greater sense of job security. For others the cue could be evidence that home prices have bottomed for good, or that ultra-low mortgage rates are slipping away,” he said. The median price paid for a Southland home was $287,000 in November. That was up 1.4 percent from $283,000 in October, and up 0.7 percent from $285,000 in November 2009. The 0.7 percent annual gain was the lowest since the median began rising year-over-year each month since last December.

The median’s low point for the current real estate cycle was $247,000 in April 2009, while the high point was $505,000 in mid 2007. The peak-to-trough drop was due to a decline in home values as well as a shift in sales toward low-cost homes, especially inland foreclosures. Foreclosure resales – homes foreclosed on in the past year – accounted for 35.1 percent of the resale market last month, up from 34.7 percent in October but down from 39.0 percent a year ago. Foreclosure resales hit a low this year of 32.8 percent in June and, with the exception of a dip in September, have trended slightly higher ever since. The peak was in February 2009 at 56.7 percent, DataQuick reported.

Government-insured FHA loans, a popular low-down-payment choice among first-time buyers, accounted for 36.2 percent of all mortgages used to purchase homes in November, up from 35.8 percent in October but down slightly from 36.5 percent in November 2009. Two years ago FHA loans made up 34.3 percent of the purchase loan market, while three years ago it was just 2.6 percent.

Last month 20.7 percent of all sales were for $500,000 or more, about even with 20.8 percent in October and up from 19.8 percent a year earlier. The low point for $500,000-plus sales was in February last year, when 13.6 percent of sales crossed that threshold. Over the past decade, a monthly average of 26.8 percent of homes sold for $500,000 or more. Viewed differently, Southland zip codes in the top one-third of the housing market, based on historical prices, accounted for 35.6 percent of total sales last month. That was up from 34.7 percent in October and 34.1 percent a year ago. Over the last decade, however, those higher-end areas contributed a monthly average of 37.2 percent of regional sales. Their contribution to overall sales hit a low of 26.2 percent in January 2009.

High-end sales still suffer from tight credit policies. Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) and so-called jumbo home loans have been relatively difficult to get ever since the credit crunch hit more than three years ago. Last month ARMs represented 5.6 percent of Southland purchase loans, up from 5.4 percent in October and 4.3 percent a year ago. However, over the past decade, a monthly average of 38.2 percent of purchase loans were ARMs. Jumbo loans, mortgages above the old conforming limit of $417,000, accounted for 17.8 percent of last month’s purchase lending, the same as in October and up from 15.1 percent a year earlier. But back in 2007, in the months leading up to the credit crisis that began in August that year, jumbos accounted for 40 percent of the market.

Absentee buyers – mostly investors and some second-home purchasers – bought 23.1 percent of the homes sold in November, paying a median $204,000. Over the last decade, absentee buyers purchased a monthly average of 16.0 percent of all homes, while the peak level was 23.2 percent this February. Buyers who appeared to have paid all cash – meaning there was no indication that a corresponding purchase loan was recorded – accounted for 28.0 percent of November sales, paying a median $205,000. In February this year, cash sales peaked at 30.1 percent. The 22-year monthly average for Southland homes purchased with cash is 14.3 percent.

The “flipping” of homes has generally trended higher over the past year. Last month the percentage of Southland homes bought and re-sold within a six-month period was 3.6 percent, down from 3.7 percent in October but up from 3.0 percent a year earlier. Last month’s flipping rates varied from as little as 3.4 percent in Orange and Ventura counties to as much as 4.2 percent in San Bernardino County.  MDA DataQuick, a subsidiary of Vancouver-based MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates, monitors real estate activity nationwide and provides information to consumers, educational institutions, public agencies, lending institutions, title companies and industry analysts.  The typical monthly mortgage payment that Southland buyers committed themselves to paying was $1,136 last month, up from $1,111 in October but down from $1,207 in November 2009. Adjusted for inflation, current payments are 49.3 percent below typical payments in the spring of 1989, the peak of the prior real estate cycle. They are 58.5 percent below the current cycle’s peak in July 2007.

Indicators of market distress continue to move in different directions. Foreclosure activity remains high by historical standards but is lower than peak levels reached over the last two years. Financing with multiple mortgages is very low, and down payment sizes are stable, MDA DataQuick reported.  To get away from it all – go cross country skiing.

Bank of America Being Sued for Fraud by Attorney Generals

 Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase are being investigated for servicing fraud against homeowners looking to modify their loans.  Attorney Generals in Arizona and Nevada have filed a lawsuit against Bank of America in December seeking major fines against Bank of America for lying to, and misleading millions of homeowners.  This is in addition to all the other fraud recently uncovered by mortgage servicers, setting up homeowners to lose their homes.

Mortgage fraud on the servicers and lenders part is rampant.  A forensic loan audit can uncover this fraud.   Many homeowners are seeking their own damages with a Class Action Lawsuit - by suing your lender.  Class Action Lawsuit Video.

Don’t sit back and let the lenders and servicers take away your rights.  Take action today!

SAN FRANCISCO | Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:32pm EST By Dan Levine

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – The states of Arizona and Nevada sued Bank of America Corp on Friday, accusing the largest U.S. bank of routinely misleading consumers about home loan modifications. The two lawsuits, filed by each state attorney general in Arizona and Nevada state courts, seek potentially massive fines against the bank and compensation for customers. Arizona accuses Bank of America of violating a 2009 consent judgment in which it committed to widespread home loan modifications. The bank failed to follow through, leaving borrowers in limbo, according to the suit. The bank is also accused of violating the state’s consumer fraud act.

Arizona is seeking $25,000 per violation of the consent decree, and up to $10,000 for consumer fraud breaches. Both states also ask that Bank of America pay restitution to customers.

The lawsuits could complicate Bank of America’s efforts to quickly resolve inquiries into its mortgage foreclosure practices. The probes include a 50-state investigation that is also looking at JPMorgan Chase & Co, Ally Financial and other major mortgage servicers. Last month Bank of America Chief Executive Brian Moynihan said a quick settlement of the 50-state probe would be the best solution for all involved.

Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, who is on the executive committee of the 50-state investigation, recently lost a run for governor in Arizona. Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto won reelection this past November. “This was an opportunity for the two states which have felt the biggest impact of the foreclosure crisis to stand up and say, ‘This has got to stop,’” Goddard said in a phone interview.

Bank of America Home Loans spokesman Dan Frahm said the company is disappointed Goddard filed the suit during his last days as attorney general, and that the bank would continue to work with the multi-state process. “That is the approach that will best broaden programs for homeowners who need assistance,” Frahm said in an email. Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who heads the multi-state probe, said the legal activity “neither changes, nor dilutes, the strong and resolute multi-state effort to address serious problems that have been identified with a number of mortgage servicers.”

Mortgage servicers have come under fire in recent months for abuses of the foreclosure process. In another foreclosure probe, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sent out a fresh round of subpoenas last week to big banks including Bank of America. Bank of America temporarily halted home repossessions in October as it reviewed its internal processes.  James Tierney, director of the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School, said it would be difficult for incoming Arizona AG Tom Horne to simply withdraw the lawsuit when he takes office. But if Bank of America cuts a deal with the multi-state investigation, Horne could decide to endorse it and argue against continued litigation. “That’s perfectly fine,” Tierney said. “That’s what AGs do.”

According to Goddard, Bank of America representatives contacted Horne in a bid to head off a lawsuit. Goddard called the outreach “highly inappropriate,” and said Horne took the same position.  Frahm said he was not aware of those interactions, and Horne did not respond to requests for comment. In 2009 Bank of America agreed to a consent judgment over home loans made by its Countrywide unit. The bank committed to loan modifications which it valued at roughly $8.4 billion nationally, the Arizona lawsuit says. The company violated the judgment by failing to make decisions on loan modifications, according to the suit. Bank of America also misled consumers by telling them that their modifications were declined because investors in mortgage-backed securities had not approved them, even though in some cases no such permission was necessary, the lawsuit says. Bank of America shares closed up 5 cents at $12.57 on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case in Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa is State of Arizona v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al, 2010-033580. The case in District Court for Clark County, Nevada is State of Nevada v. Bank of America Corp. et al, 10-631557. (Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Steve Orlofsky, John Wallace and Richard Chang)

Foreclosure Forgeries by Banks Exposed – San Diego

Bank of America, GMAC, JP Morgan Chase,  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae have all been caught forging signatures, creating fake documents, and other illegal activity when trying to foreclose.  The Washington Post’s article below goes into the ugly details.  This goes to prove that the lenders are not playing fair when dealing with your mortgage, and you must be on your guard.  For that reason, we are recommending a forensic loan audit before you approach the lender.  You must have ammunition to fight back!  Whether you choose to remodify the mortgage (and stay in the same fraudulent contract), get out of the contract through a short sale, or decide to pursue an administrative (HUD) remidy or legal remedy, we encourage you to fight fire with fire (but be above board, unlike the banks).  

It’s a tough real estate market for everyone, particularly in San Diego.  Homeowners in San Diego are being invited by the banks to “meet with them”, but unknown to them these lenders and/or services are just stringing them along to eventually take the house.  I say be prepared for battle! 

Amid mountain of paperwork, shortcuts and forgeries mar foreclosure process
 
By Ariana Eunjung Cha and Brady Dennis
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, September 23, 2010; 2:36 AM

The nation’s overburdened foreclosure system is riddled with faked documents, forged signatures and lenders who take shortcuts reviewing borrower’s files, according to court documents and interviews with attorneys, housing advocates and company officials. The problems, which are so widespread that some judges approving the foreclosures ignore them, are coming to light after Ally Financial, the country’s fourth-biggest mortgage lender, halted home evictions in 23 states this week.

During the housing boom, millions of homeowners got easy access to mortgages while providing virtually no proof of their income or background. Now, as millions of Americans are being pushed out of the homes they can no longer afford, the foreclosure process is producing far more paperwork than anyone can read and making it vulnerable to fraud.

Ally Financial is now double-checking to make sure all documents are in order after lawsuits uncovered that a single employee of the company’s GMAC mortgage unit, a 41-year-old named Jeffrey Stephan, signed off on 10,000 foreclosure papers a month without checking whether the information justified an eviction.

Many of the homeowners in fact might have been in default. Some might have been unfairly targeted. But the flawed process is creating an opening for borrowers to contest some of the more than 2 million foreclosures that have taken place since the real estate crisis began.

The company sought to play down the impact of Stephan’s actions, saying this week that what he did amounted to a “technical” error but that the documents themselves were “factually accurate.” Ally said it had no further comment Wednesday.

Forgeries

Ally wasn’t the only major lender that had a foreclosure process dependent on a few corporate bureaucrats.

Beth Ann Cottrell said in a sworn deposition in May that she signed off on thousands of foreclosures a month for JPMorgan Chase even though she did not verify the accuracy of the information.

In one instance in Palm Beach, Fla., Cottrell signed off on two documents that stated conflicting amounts of mortgage, the court testimony states. Cottrell claimed that both were signed by the borrower at closing. But the homeowner recognized that her signature had been forged, her attorney Christopher Immel said. The attorney added that such forgeries are common among the cases he’s seen. JPMorgan Chase declined to comment.

In Georgia, an employee of a document processing company, Linda Green, for years claimed to be executives of Bank of America, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank and dozens of other lenders while signing off on tens of thousands of foreclosure affidavits. In many cases, her signature appeared to be forged by different employees.

Green worked for a foreclosure document company owned by Lender Processing Services. The company is being investigated by a U.S. attorney in Florida for allegedly using improper documentation to speed foreclosures.

Lenders have already started to withdraw foreclosures that had Green’s name on them. Green also submitted to courts documents that listed “Bogus Assignee” as the owner of a mortgage instead of the real name. In another case, she signed as the vice president of “Bad Bene,” a made-up company Michelle Kersch, a senior vice president for Lender Processing Services, said in an e-mailed statement Wednesday that the names were just “placeholders.”

“Unfortunately, on occasion, incomplete documents were inadvertently recorded before the missing information was obtained,” she said. “LPS regrets these errors and the use of this particular placeholder phrasing.”

The company declined to comment further, citing the pending criminal investigation.

A large chunk of the nation’s foreclosures are being initiated by three companies owned by the federal government: Ally, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie and Freddie have said they are looking at the matter but refuse to reveal the numbers of affected homeowners.

The Obama administration has repeatedly said it would try to help homeowners facing foreclosure. But its principal mortgage-relief effort is faltering. More than half of those who enrolled in the program are have now fallen out of it, the Treasury Department said Wednesday.

This week, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and the Obama administration’s newly appointed consumer protection adviser, Elizabeth Warren, also vowed to simplify the process for getting a mortgage.

But when asked to respond to problems plaguing foreclosures at the companies controlled by the Treasury, a spokesman repeatedly declined to respond to questions, saying only that the agency does not involve itself in the companies’ day-to-day affairs.

Judges’ oversight

Some of the problems in foreclosure paperwork are being created because mortgage loans were repackaged and resold to investors so often that the physical documents become lost. It’s the job of a document processor to present and vouch for the authenticity and accuracy of these papers, but attorneys for homeowners have unearthed examples where critical records are forged.

In theory, a judge should review the files one more time. But after the crisis produced massive numbers of delinquent homeowners, judges in many cases became overwhelmed.

Some simply took at face value the documents handed over to them by the lenders – who in many cases were not checking the files, either, according to interviews with judges, attorneys and consumer groups.

In some Florida courts, for instance, many judges automatically approve a foreclosure unless a borrower can point to a specific problem. Homeowners are given five minutes for a presentation. Often, they do not bother to show up.

Arthur M. Schack, a Kings County Supreme Court judge in Brooklyn, said it’s clear those involved in the foreclosure process are taking the legal requirements too lightly. They forget, he said, that there’s a bigger picture to think about: People are losing their homes.

“There are ramifications on society and neighborhoods,” he said.

Schack has become infamous among some of the nation’s most powerful banks for rejecting foreclosure motions that come across his courtroom – about half of the hundreds of files that he has reviewed over nearly three years. He said Ally’s document-processing violations shouldn’t be dismissed lightly.

“There are procedures to be followed in order to get a foreclosure, and you either get it right or not. Either you’re pregnant or not. There’s no in-between,” he said.

But Judge Isaac Garb, a retired trial judge in Bucks County, Pa., who has heard many foreclosure cases and still oversees mortgage mediations, had a different view.

He said that because foreclosure files contain standard language, document processors such as Stephan do not need to review every page. He added that the signers are verifying only that the information in the file is “true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belief.”

Often, homeowners are using minor problems in the documents simply to stall the foreclosure process as long as possible, Garb said.

David Berenbaum, chief program officer for the nonprofit National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said companies eager to get bad loans off their books quickly have given rise to a foreclosure system that is as faulty as the excessive lending that created the problem in the first place.

“What’s happened here is that there are these foreclosure machines that don’t do due diligence and that are profiting at the expense of consumers,” he said.

Dennis reported from Doylestown, Pa. Staff researchers Julie Tate and Magda Jean-Louis contributed to this report. Julie regularly posts at her blog as well. www.JulieFontaine.com.

Report: Foreclosure more Profitable than Loan Modifications


NCLC Report on Mortgage Servicers